- Special Offers
- Visit the Resource Center
- Webinar Registration
- Call us at 866.SEPATON (866.737.2866)
- Email us: moreInfo @ sepaton.com
- Request backup assessment
- Register for weekly Webinar
- Sign up for TITLE newsletter
- Request SEPATON brochures
Virtual Tape Backup vs. Disk Based Backup vs. Tape Backup
When tape was your only option and paper was king, choosing backup solutions for your enterprise was a no-brainer. Today, disk is en vogue as we contend with government regulations, internal SLAs, and an unyielding rate of growth of corporate data.
Here we take a comparative look at three types of backup solutions – virtual tape backup, D2D or disk based backup, and traditional tape backup solutions.
|
Virtual Tape Backup Solutions |
Disk-to-Disk (D2D) Backup Solutions |
Physical Tape Backup Solutions |
Performance |
Virtual tape backup systems optimize performance. SEPATON offers the industry’s fastest performance – up to 9600 MB/sec. |
Can theoretically perform at wire speed. However, continuously optimizing for performance is resource intensive. |
Performance is improving, but inability to meet backup and restore windows and administrative burdens cause most enterprises to implement disk based backup or virtual tape backup solutions. |
Scalability |
Leading virtual tape backup systems are built using a grid architecture that maximizes scalability. A single SEPATON VTL appliance can grow from 7TB to 1.6PB of useable storage. |
No limitations to scaling a disk based backup solution. Again growth is often restricted by administration burdens. |
Tape libraries can be quite large. However, if you run out of capacity in one, you’re looking at a sizeable investment to add another. |
Data Integrity |
Many virtual tape backup appliances have top of the line data protection features built in (RAID 6, hot spares, etc.). Hands-free administration is your safest bet. |
RAID protection, hot spares and other safety features can get pricey when implemented one by one, but disk based backup is inherently safer than tape. |
The nature of human handling is rife with risks including loss, theft and corruption. Any of these could bring you the 15-minutes of fame you’ll wish you never had. |
Implementation |
One of the most appealing aspects of virtual tape backup is ease of implementation. No policy or infrastructure changes. Off an running in as little as 30 minutes. |
Implementation requirements vary based with D2D solutions. Any way you slice it though, it’ll be more complex and costly than a virtual tape backup system. |
Fairly straightforward given that most environments have an established tape infrastructure supporting by the backup application. |
Added Features |
Virtual tape backup vendors are the leaders in innovating new backup technologies. |
Your options will be limited, but you can add some advanced features to a D2D system. Just beware of managing additional vendors and integrations with each feature you want access to. |
Perhaps the greatest drawback of tape is its static nature. Want deduplication? Replication? Think virtual tape backup. |
Price |
Virtual tape backup will tend to have a higher price tag than other backup solutions, because of both software and hardware components. |
Disk based backup solutions will require the lowest capital expenditure of the disk options. However, watch out for burgeoning administration costs and software needs as the environment grows. |
Why is tape still considered a viable backup solution? It’s cheap. Consider staff time when building a business justification to go to higher-priced disk. |
TCO |
While procurement costs may exceed other solutions, virtual tape backup systems dramatically reduce administration time and scale easily. Hands-down winner in terms of TCO. |
Managing a growing D2D environment will tax staff resources and may result in costs that were unforeseen at the project inception. |
Tape’s cheap, but people are not. And there’s no one that’s ever managed a tape environment that would say it’s efficient. |


